When the law is liberating

 Because the post moderns,  like the prechristians, are into more laws and more governance, as a solution to everything,  let me make a list of some the new names for the rediscoveries of old burdens . 

1. Nannyism (Emperors who insist on parenting)   NIMBYISM  thy problem not my problem 
2. Cancelling , gaslighting , 
3. Post christain marxim where it pays the Criminal's bills because he was somehow disadvantaged
4. Any religion once there are steps up the pulpit  rather than down to kneeling for confession   
   
5. Any computer that is switched on and typed into with the subject --- the other 
   
6. Modern forms of self-righteousness ; any mind who sees how a mere law , if listened towould have stopped a disaster ..... and given ME credit  for being such a smart A .
7. Any teacher who has been persuaded to force change,, not inspire change> There are a  few in Council and the House right now 
   
8.  We could both go on .......
   Why don't you  list some NOW   you would have some examples
   
   One of the best things when simple laws are applied is that they are protective  A man over his family ; a leader over the team. 
    All Men ( includings XX's ) are prone to forgetting the responsibility and remembering only the rights of high office.
   
   The world,  instead of remembering the limits to laws and the liberty of love and laws of constraint and protection is in a rush to make more laws in the hope of limiting the landslides. Departments dedicated to moving the earth .
   
   ALBO ALLAN and BURKE are not alone in being lost in immoral and irresponsible reactive responses with clever sounding excuses - lets just  call it lying ,  Children do it when cornered . 
   Its true  that the law  ( from the Garden up) that says that you are responsible if you are charge is only true if you did not know what was going wrong,  
   
   If you, in charge , don't know what is wrong and you say you didn't know what is wrong , you still should resign that office because you took it as your oath /gift of office to know and to find out if you weren't sure. 
    The Law is not for pedants, ( and excusemakers as children quickly learn to try )  but only those who take the job of protection , finding out and responsibility very seriously; If you can't and don't check things,  you should leave. 
    The only excuse i know for "I don't remember" ( Nixon) or "
   I was not not briefed"  is that you didn't make time to know ( Romans 13:4) 

Ineffective anger management and Hypocrisy

The current epidemic of cancelling and gaslighting in the West  has its origin in the return of the overly simple feelings-based idea that "how you feel" is the only morality that matters.
According to now modern morality, anger is considered bad when clearly it cannot be.

Anger is not a sin, even though it can easily turn into it, " be angry but sin not "
True caring and correction for each other must involve something less shallow and distracting than cancelling and one up man ship.  
The current epidemic is therefore not a change in how many bad people there are, but a change in how people perceive badness.
The accuser is not only more evident now, but the self-righteousness quieter party in is often completely in the wrong because as said below, the fingers point both way because anger produces anger in both parties;

The hypocritical party thinks because they don't show anger in themselves, that it doesn't exist . 
The honest party is working on resolving what will otherwise fester. 


For example.
The now popular heresy that men or women who get angry are bad ,resists and prevents resolution. Compare the more effective venting of anger that was taught in the past.

The adoption, by the modern West of the old and eastern idea that to express anger is wrong , is causing suppression of it, Weigh it up to see if that process works and builds understanding and respect. 

According to now modern morality, anger is considered bad when clearly it cannot be - even if you don't believe in God, adrenalin performs a valuable function in challenging abuse and threats with words as well as action.    People need to speak their minds and risk getting accused of anger and even hate  ,
The old procedure outlined in the New Testament works because it anticipates the reality of short term adrenalin action , irrational words and how to forgive them ( before the sun goes down ) 

The Queensland Premier cancelling Pauline Hanson this week shows his confusion and hypocrisy. 
  Clearly he + Irwin are misleading the children on what is libel  because open confrontation on content of what you say  is OK .
The 8th commandment forbids the current epidemic of fires lit by NOT addressing the CONTENT but attacking THE PERSON. 

If the Premier doesn't admit he is wrong (on the content ), he can be judged .  

The Reactionaries know nothing about the Law

and by relying on their latest directive or law they show themselves INCOMPETENT as Household administrators. "Wait till your father gets home" is what works outside the kindergarten. The current Labor lot are as weak as water. Its been evident for decades. Instead of the old idea that law only works when you seek education and cooperation, Labor ministers draft daft pieces of pedantry to try to shut doors after the horses have bolted or just simply because they aren't used to making tough decisions. Premier Daniel Andrews was a classic perpetrator - and worse was not accountable to the law . These inexperienced bush lawyers know nothing about common sense , common sense law practice and common law.  

Minister Giles is not alone in hoping, like some Pharisees of old, that he can write a directive on how to make decisions  when its his job to make those decisions. And none of his colleagues has any idea or if they did,  they keep their mouths shut as you do in a dependent on playing on all sides nice little kindergarten state . 
The children in charge try to run everything in the pedants courts where mere word play is the game . This was always the Pharisees way and it only works if have control and you can cancel the guilty and get them executed ; silenced. 
The public are confused because of the snowing affect of all that paperwork. 
Short term gain long term pain . After all,  an appeal to a higher court ( incl the people and fair minded persons who insist on trial by testing in court )
 
Never in Australia's history have key value word lost so much reliability in their meaning. let alone the phrases in which they are put, Even astute bush lawyers in the medialike laura tingle forget that while racism is common,  and for groups  to have consititutions which are clearly racist it is not sound to ever to condemn racism as a sin  when it can just mean you prefer one cultural group over another ; or if you think women are commonly treated badly  that sexism couldn't be the term for the form of preferential treatment  they are offered by law,
Make u your minds ABC !  do you think freedom to think and speak is so low on the justice courts of this country that it is to be adjudicated by pedants who ARE OBLIGED  IN THEIR JUDGEMENTS to tick boxes .
Can no longer talk about the unfair treatment of one group?  Some of us are not children afraid to be offended by what others say about us.