Ineffective anger management and Hypocrisy

The current epidemic of cancelling and gaslighting in the West  has its origin in the return of the overly simple feelings-based idea that "how you feel" is the only morality that matters.
According to now modern morality, anger is considered bad when clearly it cannot be.

Anger is not a sin, even though it can easily turn into it, " be angry but sin not "
True caring and correction for each other must involve something less shallow and distracting than cancelling and one up man ship.  
The current epidemic is therefore not a change in how many bad people there are, but a change in how people perceive badness.
The accuser is not only more evident now, but the self-righteousness quieter party in is often completely in the wrong because as said below, the fingers point both way because anger produces anger in both parties;

The hypocritical party thinks because they don't show anger in themselves, that it doesn't exist . 
The honest party is working on resolving what will otherwise fester. 


For example.
The now popular heresy that men or women who get angry are bad ,resists and prevents resolution. Compare the more effective venting of anger that was taught in the past.

The adoption, by the modern West of the old and eastern idea that to express anger is wrong , is causing suppression of it, Weigh it up to see if that process works and builds understanding and respect. 

According to now modern morality, anger is considered bad when clearly it cannot be - even if you don't believe in God, adrenalin performs a valuable function in challenging abuse and threats with words as well as action.    People need to speak their minds and risk getting accused of anger and even hate  ,
The old procedure outlined in the New Testament works because it anticipates the reality of short term adrenalin action , irrational words and how to forgive them ( before the sun goes down ) 

The Queensland Premier cancelling Pauline Hanson this week shows his confusion and hypocrisy. 
  Clearly he + Irwin are misleading the children on what is libel  because open confrontation on content of what you say  is OK .
The 8th commandment forbids the current epidemic of fires lit by NOT addressing the CONTENT but attacking THE PERSON. 

If the Premier doesn't admit he is wrong (on the content ), he can be judged .