Maxine McKew and others on the drum tonight symbolize the fanaticism and desperate cul de sac mentality of trying to rule by laws alone . Too much "talk tough" talk with some "bad group" shifts the context ( need for toughness all over ).
Maxine , typical of this generation of deniers (think that OTHER men need more rules, not a saviour ) uses the nice word "protocol " while the chorus of "tough " talk rattles around in their cage; more like some carcass hunting noisy bird rather than some animal of true threat and substance ( the lion ) on the ground.Our society was built on the idea of a saviour who helps you budget well , not the stupid Labor saviour who just carelessly pays the bills.
Thedrum ,while a great show , needs to have more genuine experts on it - otherwise it will be treated as it often treats itself ----carrion speculation over the entrails .
The "Spectators" treatment of the AWB scandal was so simplistic as to be plain scandalous . OK mate if you are going to talk across everyone -get it right and don't be like everyone else -trite ;Agriculture and environment is a ' special case " a bit of diversity in your myopia. Why market the grand simplicities that don't work .Friedman got the noble prize but Galbraith was the real brains behind growth in a difficult climate - the people want the sort of growth that is unsustainable - we in the country avoid it naturally because we have knowledge , not ust talk of sustainability .
If Scott's? paper is just another drone preaching " 2legs bad, market good " we clearly don't need to read it .
Friday, October 04, 2013
Left left with nothing but Laws
Labels:
ABC,
economic crisis,
galbraith,
mcKew,
reactionaries,
saviour,
the left,
the spectator,
thedrum
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Napthine is making a lot of noise about toughness, but is his targeting any better. Lots of People standing around on stations in uniform is fine but there are better jobs ( I had one ) - Libs symbolize a reactive approach;U get a lot more bang for buck if you prevent problems ;problem is few parties know what good their staff are doing in that area .( not featherbedding but on the edge -person 2 person programs.
Napthine is making a lot of noise about toughness, but is his targeting any better. Lots of People standing around on stations in uniform is fine but there are better jobs ( I had one ) - Libs symbolize a reactive approach;U get a lot more bang for buck if you prevent problems ;problem is few parties know what good their staff are doing in that area .( not featherbedding but on the edge -person 2 person programs.
Post a Comment